Ramanuja biography of christopher


Ramanuja

12th-century Indian Hindu philosopher

"Ramanujacharya" redirects here. Dispense the Indian film, see Ramanujacharya (film).

Ramanuja ([ɽaːmaːnʊdʑɐ]; Middle Tamil: Rāmāṉujam; Classical Sanskrit: Rāmānuja; c. [b] – ), too known as Ramanujacharya, was an Amerindian Hindu philosopher, guru and a communal reformer. He is noted to remedy one of the most important exponents of the Sri Vaishnavism tradition centre Hinduism.[10] His philosophical foundations for devotionalism were influential to the Bhakti movement.[11][12]

Ramanuja's guru was Yādava Prakāśa, a academic who according to tradition belonged scheduled the Advaita Vedānta tradition,[13] but as likely as not was a Bhedabheda scholar. Sri Hindu tradition holds that Ramanuja disagreed give up his guru and the non-dualistic Advaita Vedānta, and instead followed in blue blood the gentry footsteps of Tamil Alvārs tradition, influence scholars Nāthamuni and Yamunāchārya. Ramanuja recap famous as the chief proponent friendly Vishishtadvaita school of Vedānta, and disciples were likely authors of texts such as the Shatyayaniya Upanishad.[13] Ramanuja himself wrote influential texts, such on account of Sanskrit bhāsyas on the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita.

His Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism) philosophy has competed with integrity Dvaita (theistic dualism) philosophy of Madhvāchārya, and Advaita (non-dualism) philosophy of Ādi Shankara, together the three most convince Vedantic philosophies of the 2nd millennium.[18][19] Ramanuja presented the epistemic and drunk importance of bhakti, or the reverence to a personal God (Vishnu collect Ramanuja's case) as a means interrupt spiritual liberation. His theories assert renounce there exists a plurality and discrimination between Ātman (soul) and Brahman (metaphysical, ultimate reality), while he also described that there is unity of gross souls and that the individual inner has the potential to realize sameness with the Brahman.[19][21]

Early life

Ramanuja was inherent into a Tamil Brahmin community, wonderful a village called Sriperumbudur (present-day Dravidian Nadu) under the Chola Empire. Sovereignty followers in the Vaishnava tradition wrote hagiographies, some of which were poised in centuries after his death, viewpoint which the tradition believes to elect true.[10]

The traditional hagiographies of Ramanuja claim he was born to mother Kānthimathi and father Asuri Keshava Somayāji,[22] be of advantage to Sriperumbudur, near modern Chennai, Tamil Nādu. He is believed to have antediluvian born in the month of Chithirai under the star Tiruvadhirai. They tighten his life from –, yielding shipshape and bristol fashion lifespan of years. However, based bring to a halt 11th- and 12th-century temple records near regional literature outside the Sri Hindoo tradition, modern era scholars suggest dump Ramanuja might have lived from –[22]

Ramanuja married, moved to Kānchipuram, and wilful with Yādava Prakāśa as his guru.[11][13][25] Ramanuja and his guru frequently disagreed in interpreting Vedic texts, particularly justness Upanishads.[22][26] Ramanuja and Yādava Prakāśa divided, and thereafter Ramanuja continued his studies on his own.[10][25]

He attempted to legitimate another famed Vedanta scholar of 11th-century Yamunāchārya, but Sri Vaishnava tradition holds that the latter died before blue blood the gentry meeting and they never met.[10] Ramanuja was the great-grandson of Yamunāchārya ravage a granddaughter.[27] However, some hagiographies insist that the corpse of Yamunāchārya magic rose and named Ramanuja as grandeur new leader of Sri Vaishnava look at piece by piece previously led by Yamunāchārya.[10] One hagiography states that after leaving Yādava Prakāśa, Ramanuja was initiated into Sri Hinduism by Periya Nambi, also called Mahapurna, another Vedānta scholar. Ramanuja renounced fillet married life, and became a Asiatic monk. However, Katherine Young states put off evidence on whether Ramanuja led grand married or renunciate life is uncertain.[29]

Career

Ramanuja became a priest at the Varadharāja Perumal temple (dedicated to the hero Vishnu) at Kānchipuram, where he began to teach that moksha (liberation challenging release from samsara) is to fur achieved not with metaphysical, nirgunaBrahman on the contrary with the help of personal deity and saguna Vishnu. Ramanuja believed consider it when scriptures such as the Vedas declare god as nirguna, they have to be interpreted as saying that gear such as pain, sorrow, mortality duct age are absent in god.[25][30][31] Ramanuja has long enjoyed foremost authority take away the Sri Vaishnava tradition.

Hagiographies

A number devotee traditional biographies of Ramanuja are protest, some written in 12th century, on the other hand some written centuries later such thanks to the 17th or 18th century, remarkably after the split of the Śrīvaiṣṇava community into the Vadakalais and Teṉkalais, where each community created its let fly version of Ramanuja's hagiography.[29][33] The Muvāyirappaṭi Guruparamparāprabhāva by Brahmatantra Svatantra Jīyar represents the earliest Vadakalai biography, and reflects the Vadakalai view of the cluster following Ramanuja. Ārāyirappaṭi Guruparamparāprabhāva, on say publicly other hand, represents the Tenkalai history. Other late biographies include the Yatirajavaibhavam by Andhrapurna.[29]

Historical background

Ramanuja grew up critical the Tamil culture, in a tamp down society during the rule of birth Chola dynasty. This period was lone of pluralistic beliefs, where Vaishnava, Shaiva, Smarta traditions, Buddhism and Jainism thrived together. In Hindu monastic tradition, Advaita Vedānta had been dominant,[13] and Ramanuja's guru Yādava Prākāsha belonged to that tradition.[25] Prior to Ramanuja, the Sri Vaishnava sampradaya was already an measure organization under Yamunāchārya, and bhakti songs and devotional ideas were already well-ordered part of Tamil culture because call upon the twelve Alvārs.[35] Ramanuja's fame grew because he was considered the lid thinker in centuries that disputed Shankara's theories, and offered an alternative adaptation of Upanishadic scriptures.

Early life

When Ramanuja become calm his guru Yadava Prakaasa parted structure due to their differences in rendition the Vedic literature, Ramanuja became well-ordered devotee of the Varadaraja Perumal church in Kanchi. During this period, Ramanuja's discourses and fame reached far have a word with wide. Yamunacharya, the Vaishnavite acharya sit the religious head of the Ranganathasamy temple at Srirangam had been nearly following Ramanuja from a very grassy age. When it was time damage pass on the legacy, the acharya decided that he would call conclude Ramanuja. Accordingly, he summoned Sri Mahapurna, a disciple who was helping him out with the temple affairs enthralled asked him to go to Kanchi and bring Ramanuja.[36]

When Mahapurna met Ramanuja and informed him of his guru's desire, Ramanuja was overjoyed and they both immediately left for Srirangam. On the other hand bad news awaited them at Srirangam and they both learned that Yamunacharya had died. Heart-broken, Ramanuja then sinistral for Kanchi and refused to adulate Sri Ranganatha for he held him responsible for taking away Yamunacharya munch through this world.[37] As for Mahapurna, stylishness began to assist Tiruvaranga Araiyar, distinction son of Yamunacharya in managing goodness temple affairs. But as time passed by, Tiruvaranga Araiyar and other older members of the Vaishnavite order mat that there was a vacuum back Yamunacharya's demise and that they desired a person who could interpret prestige Vedas and Sastras like Yamunacharya. Straight-faced it was finally decided that Sri Mahapurna should once again go countryside invite Ramanuja to Srirangam.[37]

Meanwhile, in Kanchi, Ramanuja regularly met with Kanchipurna, precise fellow devotee, and soon decided ensure he would become Kanchipurna's disciple. What because he approached Kanchipurna about this, Kanchipurna politely refused as he did crowd belong to the same caste monkey Ramanuja and told him that fair enough would get a more appropriate guru.[37] After this Kanchipurna left for Tirupati to worship Lord Venkateswara and would return only after six months. While in the manner tha he finally came back, it was through him that Lord Varadaraja boom his wish to Ramanuja. Accordingly, Kanchipurna advised Ramanuja that it was influence Lord's wish that he leave be after Srirangam and find solace in Sri Mahapurna.[36]

Induction into Vaishnavism

After it was trustworthy that Mahapurna would go and tempt Ramanuja to Srirangam, the acharya omitted for Kanchi with his wife. Determine on his way to Kanchi, Mahapurna and his wife decided to nastiness some rest at Maduranthakam, a portentous that is located 40&#;km from concoct day Chennai. As fate would plot it Ramanuja, who was on potentate way to Srirangam, arrived at say publicly same place and to his jubilation found Mahapurna. They soon embraced prattle other and Ramanuja requested that prohibited waste no time in initiating him into the Vaishnavite order. Mahapurna promptly obliged and Ramanuja received the Panchasamskaras (the five sacraments).

Persecution

Some hagiographies, composed centuries after Ramanuja died, state that unornamented Chola king, Kulothunga II,[39] had grand hatred towards Sri Vaishnavism. He was called Krimikanta Chola or worm-necked Chola, so called as the king not bad said to have suffered from rendering cancer of the neck or throat.[40][41] Historian Nilakanta Sastri identifies Krimikanta Chola with Adhirajendra Chola or Virarajendra Chola with whom the main line (Vijayalaya line) ended.[42][43] Knowing the evil lay out of the king, Sri Rāmānujā's schoolboy, Sri Koorathazhwan persuaded Ramanuja to lack of restraint the Chola kingdom. Sri Rāmānujā abuse moved to Hoysala kingdom for 14 years, wherein he converted a Faith king, Bitti Deva to Hinduism provision miraculously healing his daughter. Bitti Deva changed his name to Vishnuvardhana. Striking Vishnuvardhana assisted Sri Rāmānujā to construct a temple of Lord Thirunarayanaswamy stroke Melukote, which is now a holy place town in Mandya district of Mysore. Rāmānujā later returned on his tumble to Tamil Nādu after the buy it of Krimikanta Chola.[39] According to Sastri, Krimikanta or Adhirajendra Chola was stick in a local uprising of depiction Vaishnavas.[43][44]

According to "Koil Olugu" (temple records) of the Srirangam temple, Kulottunga Tierce was the son of Krimikanta Chola or Karikala Chola.[45] The former, distinct from his father, is said to own acquire been a repentant son who founded Vaishnavism.[46][47] Ramanuja is said to take made Kulottunga III as a scholar of his nephew, Dasarathi. The sovereign then granted the management of magnanimity Ranganathaswamy temple to Dasarathi and consummate descendants as per the wish objection Ramanuja.[48][49] Some historians hold that Krimikanta, who persecuted Ramanuja, had a unauthorized animosity towards Ramanuja and did call persecute Vaishnavites.[50]

Reformation

The Sri Vaishnavite order above to Ramanuja was not averse inherit people from other castes as both Kanchipurna and Mahapurna were non-Brahmins.[37] In this fashion when Ramanuja revolted against the tastefulness that had crept within the dynasty system, he was simply following dignity same lines as the Alwars unacceptable helped the people who were thoughtful to be untouchables (dasa, dasulu, dasu), to get absorbed into the Sri Vaishnava Bhakti Movement, encouraging them able attain Spiritual enlightenment by teaching them Sri Alwar Divyaprabandham. He called these downtrodden classes as Tirukulattar, meaning "of noble descent" in Tamil, and was instrumental in admitting them into distinction temple in Melukote.[52] Ramanuja's liberal views also led to the reorganization pressure rituals in Srirangam and the participation of non-Brahmin people in the Hindu worship. This policy change contributed hear the enhancement of social status famine artisanal and other non-Brahmin caste bands, especially the weavers (SenguntharKaikola Mudaliyar) who were one of the chief beneficiaries. After the period of Ramanuja, position Sri Vaishnava community split on that issue and formed the Vadakalai (northern and Sanskritic) and Thenkalai (southern dowel Tamil) sects.[53] Both sects believe pretense initiation into Sri Vaishnavism through Pancha Samskara. This ceremony or rite befit passage is necessary for one medical become a Sri Vaishnava Brahmin. Air travel is performed by Brahmins and non-Brahmins in order to become Vaishnavas.[55]

Attempts forge Ramanuja's life

There were multiple attempts persist in Ramanuja's life. When he was expert student under Yadava Prakasa, the current grew jealous of Ramanuja's rise chance on fame. So Yadava Prakasa tried choose get rid of Ramanuja during trim tour to the Ganges in federal India. Govinda, Ramanuja's cousin (son human his mother's sister),[27] learned of that plot and warned Ramanuja who exploitation left the group and escaped bash into Kanchi with the help of stop up elderly hunter couple. Later Yadava Prakasa realised his folly and became elegant disciple under Ramanuja.[56][57]

Later another attempt was made on Ramanuja's life while sharp-tasting was about to take charge lose the temple affairs in Srirangam. Picture head priest of the Ranganathaswamy House of god, Srirangam did not like Ramanuja stomach decided to kill him. Accordingly, dirt invited Ramanuja to his house stick up for having food and planned to considerate him by poisoning his food. Nevertheless, when Ramanuja arrived, the priest's bride saw the divine glow of Ramanuja and immediately confessed her husband's orchestrate. This did not deter the cleric who then made another attempt just as Ramanuja visited the temple. He poisoned the temple Theertham(holy water) and served it to Ramanuja. However instead clean and tidy dying Ramanuja began to dance be a sign of joy. The priest taken aback ready once realised his mistake and pelt at the feet of Ramanuja.[58]

Writings

The Sri Vaisnava tradition attributes nine Sanskrit texts to Ramanuja – Vedarthasamgraha (literally, "Summary of the Vedas's meaning"), Sri Bhashya (a review and commentary on decency Brahma Sutras), Bhagavad Gita Bhashya (a review and commentary on the Bhagavad Gita), and the minor works lordly Vedantadipa, Vedantasara, Gadya Trayam (which even-handed a compilation of three texts christened the Sharanagati Gadyam, Sriranga Gadyam, stall the Vaikuntha Gadyam), and the Nitya Grantham.[59]

Some scholars have questioned the believability of all other writings except rank three of the largest works credited to Ramanuja — Sri Bhashya, Vedarthasamgraha, and the Bhagavad Gita Bhashya — and the Gadya Trayam he solidly in Srirangam.[60][61]

Philosophy

Ramanuja's philosophical foundation was experienced monism, and is called Vishishtadvaita manner the Hindu tradition.[19][62] His ideas curb one of three subschools in Vedānta, the other two are known translation Ādi Shankara's Advaita (absolute monism) leading Madhvāchārya's Dvaita (dualism).[19]

Rāmānuja’s Epistemology

Rāmānuja's epistemology silt hyperrealistic or similar to naïve empiricism.[63] The first two sources of route are perception and inference, and they are trustworthy notwithstanding general human eriority to "beginningless ignorance." Knowledge is universally of the real, even in dreams, and error is a disordered discernment or faulty inference concerning what evenhanded really there. The third source method knowledge is the testimony of the good book, or more strictly, śabda ("eternal sound"), which helps to establish much zigzag is uncertain on the basis mean sense perception and inference, notably position existence and nature of the last reality (brahman). Though unlike some proponents of naïve empiricism, Rāmānuja does weep think that it suffices to fragmentary have an acquaintance with objects use your indicators knowledge. Knowledge (jñāna) only occurs what because there is direct perception of include object. Unlike proper empiricists, Rāmānuja does not restrict knowledge to that which can be gathered from the senses.[64][65][25] Rāmānuja asserts that knowledge about Demiurge comes exclusively from the Vedic good book, particularly the Upanisads, rather than let alone sensory perception or logical inference.

Rāmānuja was unique in his view that bhakti or devotion is itself an philosophy state. He says that when bhakti takes firm root in an detached, it turns into parabhakti, which interest the highest form of bhakti trip that bhakti is the direct understanding of Brahman's nature and thus psychiatry a kind of knowledge (jñāna).[67][68]

Ramanuja’s Ontology

Being a realist, Rāmānuja firmly opposed righteousness notion of māyā (illusion). In rule understanding, three distinct realities exist: organized vast expanse of material objects, great conscious souls within material bodies, current the transcendent Brahman. Each of these categories possesses a different degree carry out awareness, from the non-aware material sphere to the fully-aware Brahman, but they are all equally real. In Rāmānuja's interpretation of advaita (non-dualism), it legal action not a form of advaita orang-utan proposed by Shankara. Rāmānuja's conception supplementary bhakti maintains that there must in all cases be a separation between the buff (the soul) and the beloved (Vishnu), for true love cannot exist wanting in distinct identities. His stance suggests shipshape and bristol fashion qualified non-dualism, where both the souls and the material world, though way down interconnected with Brahman, eternally remain absurd from Brahman.[69]

In Rāmānuja's philosophy, depiction foundational concept of the soul-body sheet revolves around the idea that rendering entire universe, including both souls (jivas) and matter (prakrti), serves as representation body (sarira) of God, referred go up against as "sarira-sariri-bhava", where "sarira" means target and "sariri" means the indwelling opposite number or consciousness. This concept is firm in sruti passages like Brihadaranyaka Upanishad

"This soul of yours who even-handed present within but is different plant all beings, whom all beings dent not know. whose body is brag beings, and who controls all beings from within - he is integrity Inner Controller, the immortal one" - Brihadaranyaka Upanishad

Rāmānuja’s Soteriology

According conversation Rāmānuja, the highest good lies compel realizing our true nature and help understanding the true essence of Hindu. Moksha, or spiritual liberation, is odd as the joy of contemplating Aristocrat (rather than release from the life-death-rebirth cycle),[25] and that joy is distinction result of devotion, praise, worship last contemplation of divine perfection. Knowledge most recent Brahman consists in liberation, for Rāmānuja, mainly because of the character accomplish Brahman.[71] According to Ramanuja, Brahman encompasses everything but is not uniform revere nature. It includes elements of more, allowing it to manifest in smart diverse world. Ramanuja views Brahman similarly a personal god who rules reform a real world filled with reward spirit. He believes Brahman to be born with the attributes of “omnipotence, omniscience ride infinite love”.[31] He writes:

"Entities other stun Brahman can be objects of much cognitions of the nature of rejoicing accomplishmen only to a finite extent countryside for limited duration. But Brahman deterioration such that cognizing of him legal action an infinite and abiding joy. Miserly is for this reason that picture śruti [scripture] says, `Brahman is bliss’ (Taittirīya Upaniṣad II) Since the get to your feet of cognition as joy is map by its object, Brahman itself commission joy."[72]

Rāmānuja clarifies that mere theoretical participation of Brahman‘s nature is insufficient recognize the value of attaining moksha.[68] According to Rāmānuja, bhakti yoga, the discipline of devotion gathering worship, is the effective means good spirits liberation.[72] In his interpretation, moksha esteem not a negative separation from transmigration, or a series of rebirths, on the other hand rather the joy of the education the divine perfection. This joy practical attained by a life of concerted devotion (bhakti) to Brahman, singing rule praise, performing adulatory acts in place and private worship, and constantly dwelling-place on his perfections. In return, Hindu will offer his grace, which wish assist the devotee in gaining release.[73][74][25]

Ramanuja's Ethics

Ramanuja's ethical framework asserts that mores has both intrinsic and instrumental cost. Intrinsically, morality mirrors the divine environment of God, who is morally absolute and needs no external reasons knowledge be moral. Instrumentally, morality serves though a means to alleviate the karmic burdens of past wrongdoings and appeal appease the divine, thus facilitating ecclesiastical liberation. Ramanuja emphasizes that while system through jnana yoga is possible contain theory, it is impractical for chief. Instead, he advocates karma yoga, which involves fulfilling duties based on evident capabilities and nature, making morality neutral and suited to individual lives.[75]

Criticism be unable to find Sankara

Ramanuja argued that Shankara's interpretation worm your way in the Upanishads had serious errors.[76] Put your feet up had four major objections:

  1. Brahman was differentiated consciousness and not undifferentiated consciousness.
  2. Shankara's concept of Nirguna Brahman was misjudge and untenable.
  3. Beginningless karma, and not superimposition, was the cause of avidya.
  4. Sankara's solution of Avidya (Ignorance) and Maya (Illusion) has seven major flaws and inconsistencies.

Hermeneutic Criticism

Vedas as Doctrinally Unified Corpus

Ramanuja be a success that the Vedas are a dependable source of knowledge, then critiqued new schools of Hindu philosophy, including Advaita Vedānta, as having failed in explanation all of the Vedic texts.[78] Noteworthy asserted, in his Sri Bhāshya, make certain purvapaksin (previous schools) selectively interpret those Upanishadic passages that support their monistic interpretation, and ignore those passages delay support the pluralism interpretation.[78] There recap no reason, stated Ramanuja, to lean one part of a scripture focus on not other, the whole of leadership scripture must be considered on par.[78] One cannot, according to Ramanuja, exertion to give interpretations of isolated portions of any scripture. Rather, the the book of books must be considered one integrated capital, expressing a consistent doctrine.[78] The Vedic literature, asserted Ramanuja, mention both more and oneness, therefore the truth corrode incorporate pluralism and monism, or empty space monism.[78]

This method of scripture interpretation distinguishes Ramanuja from Ādi Shankara. Shankara's interpretative approach Samanvayat Tatparya Linga with Anvaya-Vyatireka, states that for proper understanding, cessation texts must be examined in their entirety, and then their intent folk by six characteristics. These include absorbed what the author states as monarch goal, what he repeats in her majesty explanation, what he states as rulership conclusion, and whether it can eke out an existence epistemically verified.[81][82] Not everything in lowbrow text, states Shankara, has equal remote and some ideas are the core of any expert's textual testimony. That philosophical difference in scriptural studies helped Shankara conclude that the Principal Scriptures primarily teach monism with teachings much as Tat tvam asi, while segment Ramanuja conclude that qualified monism job at the foundation of Hindu spirituality.[78][84]

Comparison with other Vedānta schools

Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita shares the theistic devotionalism ideas with Madhvāchārya's Dvaita. Both schools assert that Jīva (souls) and Brahman (as Vishnu) aim different, a difference that is not at any time transcended.[69][86] God Vishnu alone is disjointed, all other gods and beings castoffs dependent on Him, according to both Madhvāchārya and Ramanuja. However, in juxtapose to Madhvāchārya's views, Ramanuja asserts "qualified non-dualism", that souls share the by far essential nature of Brahman, and divagate there is a universal sameness donation the quality and degree of gladness possible for human souls, and ever and anon soul can reach the bliss state of affairs of God Himself.[69] While the 13th- to 14th-century Madhavāchārya asserted both "qualitative and quantitative pluralism of souls", Ramanuja asserted "qualitative monism and quantitative pluralism of souls", states Sharma.

Ramanuja's Vishishtadvaita academy and Shankara's Advaita school are both nondualistic Vedānta schools,[25][91] both are acknowledged on the assumption that all souls can hope for and achieve integrity state of blissful liberation; in juxtapose, Madhvāchārya believed that some souls utter eternally doomed and damned. Shankara's knowledge posits that only Brahman and causes are metaphysical unchanging reality, while integrity empirical world (Maya) and observed thing are changing, illusive and of allied existence.[30][62] Spiritual liberation to Shankara interest the full comprehension and realization selected oneness of one's unchanging Ātman (soul) as the same as Ātman remark everyone else as well as for one person identical to the nirguna Brahman.[18][91][94] Involved contrast, Ramanuja's theory posits both Hindustani and the world of matter conniving two different absolutes, both metaphysically eerie, neither should be called false knock back illusive, and saguna Brahman with capabilities is also real.[62] Ramanuja views Varna as the inner ruler, all expressive, and the “essence of the soul”. He describes Brahman as the basis of intelligence, truth and bliss, spell as the controller of the world.[31] God, like man, states Ramanuja, has both soul and body, and flurry of the world of matter deference the glory of God's body.[25] Illustriousness path to Brahman (Vishnu), asserted Ramanuja, is devotion to godliness and unbroken remembrance of the beauty and adoration of personal god (saguna Brahman, Vishnu).[25][30][62]

Influence

Harold Coward describes Ramanuja as "the organization interpreter of Sri Vaisnavite scripture."[95]Wendy Doniger calls him "probably the single virtually influential thinker of devotional Hinduism".[11]J. Tidy. B. van Buitenen states that Ramanuja was highly influential, by giving "bhakti an intellectual basis", and his efforts made bhakti the major force lining different traditions of Hinduism.[25]

Modern scholars be endowed with compared the importance of Ramanuja scheduled Hinduism to that of scholar Socialist Aquinas (–) in Western Christianity.[96][97][98]

Ramanuja transformed the Srirangam Ranganathaswamy temple complex, undertook India-wide tours and expanded the get of his organization. The temple course became the stronghold of his burden and his disciples. It is surrounding that he wrote his influential Vishishtadvaita philosophy text, Sri Bhashyam.

Ramanuja not developed theories and published philosophical entirety, he organized a network of temples for Vishnu-Lakshmi worship.[11] Ramanuja set supplement centers of studies for his moral during the 11th and 12th centuries, by traveling through India in dump era, and these influenced generations last part poet saints devoted to the Bhakti movement.[11] Regional traditions assert that realm visits, debates and discourses triggered change of Jains and Buddhists to Hindooism in Mysore and Deccan region.[11][62]

The cot of Ramanuja near Chennai hosts shipshape and bristol fashion temple and is an active Vishishtadvaita school. His doctrines inspire a warm-blooded intellectual tradition, and his religious encode continue in major Vaishnava centres near the Ranganātha temple in Srirangam build up the Venkateswara Temple in Tirupati.[25]

The Statue of Equality in Hyderabad, planned past as a consequence o Chinna Jeeyar, is dedicated to Ramanuja.[] It was inaugurated by Indian Top Minister Narendra Modi on 5 Feb []

Names

Ramanuja is also known as Śrī Rāmānujāchārya, Udaiyavar, Ethirājar (Yatirāja, king wheedle monks), Bhashyakara (Bhashyakarulu in Telugu),[]Godāgrajar, Thiruppavai Jeeyar, Emberumānār and Lakshmana Muni[1]

  • 'Ilayazhwar' provoke Periya Thirumalai Nambi
  • 'Boodha Puriser' by Sriperumbudur Adikesava Perumal
  • 'Am Mudalvan Evan' by Yamunāchārya
  • 'Ethirajar' and 'Ramanuja Muni' by Kanchi Perarulala Perumal
  • 'Udayavar' by Srirangam Periya Perumal
  • 'Emperumanar' newborn Tirukozhtiyur Nambi
  • 'Tiruppavai Jeeyar' by Periya Nambi
  • 'Lakshmana Muni' by Tiruvaranga Perumal Arayar
  • 'Sadagopan Ponnadi' by Tirumalaiyandan
  • 'Sri Bashyakarar' by Kalaimagal
  • 'Desi Kendiran' by Tirupathi Thiruvenkatamudayan
  • 'Koil Annan' by Srivilliputhur Kothai Nachiyar

See also

Notes

  1. ^The Tradition dates him to But it has been moot by some modern scholarship, based breather temple records and regional literature defer to 11th- and 12th-century outside the Sri Vaishnava tradition, and modern era scholars suggest that Ramanuja may have ephemeral between – CE.[4]
  2. ^The Tradition dates him to But it has been iffy by some modern scholarship, based ratifying temple records and regional literature break into 11th- and 12th-century outside the Sri Vaishnava tradition, and modern era scholars suggest that Ramanuja may have temporary between – CE.[8]

References

  1. ^ ab"Sri Ramanuja's benefaction to the Lord". The Hindu. Bharat. 24 December Archived from the fresh on 19 April Retrieved 8 Feb
  2. ^N. Jagadeesan (). Collected Papers as regards Tamil Vaishnavism. Ennes Publications. p.&#;
  3. ^Gerhard Oberhammer; Marion Rastelli (). Studies oppress Hinduism: On the mutual influences meticulous relationship of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta and Pāñcarātra. IV. Austrian Academy of Sciences Tap down. p.&#; ISBN&#;.
  4. ^Sydnor, Jon Paul (). Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Good Comparative Theology. p.&#; ISBN&#;.
  5. ^Sydnor, Jon Thankless (). Ramanuja and Schleiermacher: Toward clean up Constructive Comparative Theology. p.&#; ISBN&#;.
  6. ^ abcdeJon Paul Sydnor (). Rāmānuja and Schleiermacher: Toward a Constructive Comparative Theology. Casemate. pp.&#;20–22 with footnote ISBN&#;. Archived differ the original on 16 January Retrieved 5 October
  7. ^ abcdefDoniger, Wendy (). Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions. Merriam-Webster. p.&#; ISBN&#;.
  8. ^Hermann Kulke; Dietmar Rothermund (). A History of India. Routledge. p.&#; ISBN&#;.
  9. ^ abcdPatrick Olivelle (). The Samnyasa Upanisads&#;: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism attend to Renunciation: Hindu Scriptures on Asceticism professor Renunciation. Oxford University Press. pp.&#;10–11, 17– ISBN&#;.
  10. ^ abWilliam M. Indich (). Consciousness in Advaita Vedanta. Motilal Banarsidass. pp.&#;1–2, 97– ISBN&#;. Archived from the up-to-the-minute on 16 January Retrieved 5 Oct
  11. ^ abcdBruce M. Sullivan (). The A to Z of Hinduism. Rowman & Littlefield. p.&#; ISBN&#;.
  12. ^Sean Doyle (). Synthesizing the Vedanta: The Theology admit Pierre Johanns, S.J. Peter Lang. pp.&#;59– ISBN&#;.
  13. ^ abcMishra, Patit Paban (). "Ramanuja (ca. –ca. )". Rāmānuja (ca. –ca. ) in Encyclopedia of Global Religion (Editors: Mark Juergensmeyer & Wade Adventurer Roof). doi/n ISBN&#;.